Science · Genetics · Biblical Worldview
Science Has No Examples of Genetic Code Improvement: Data Agrees with Creation by Kinds
Modern science has no examples of genetic code improvement. For this reason, the theory of evolution cannot be called proven — and the experimental data better agree with the biblical account of creation by kinds.
The whole matter comes down to this: God created living creatures after their kinds.
«And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. And the evening and the morning were the fifth day. And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good». Genesis 1:21–25 (KJV)
God creates all living creatures after their kinds and initially placed within each kind all the base genetic information within which the kind may undergo transformation.
The Main Claim: Code Improvement Is Not Observed
Modern science does not possess a single confirmed example of random mutations leading to the improvement of the genetic code — that is, to the appearance of new functional information that did not exist before.
What is actually observed in laboratories is rearrangement, duplication, loss, or regulatory rewiring of already existing sequences. The long-term evolution experiment with E. coli (LTEE) showed that so-called «proto-genes» arise in the bacterial genome — regions that begin to be transcribed, but this is not the creation of a new gene from scratch; it is the recruitment of already existing promoters or transposons for previously silent sequences. In other words, information is not «improved» — it is rearranged or switched on.
Furthermore, studies of de novo gene birth in humans and primates show that new protein-coding genes arise from «junk» DNA through mutations that remove interfering elements, allowing RNA to exit the nucleus. This is not the addition of complex information but the removal of a block from an already existing sequence.
What the Experiments Show
- LTEE (E. coli): «proto-genes» appear — the switching on of already existing sequences, not the creation of new ones from scratch.
- De novo genes in primates: new genes arise from «junk» DNA by removing a block, not by assembling a new complex program.
- Mutations: in the overwhelming majority of cases (>90%) they are harmful; «beneficial» ones are beneficial only relatively and from a human point of view.
- Selective breeding: it unlocks hidden potential already present in the ancestor of the kind but does not create new genes.
If evolution really created new genetic information through random changes, science would long ago have had clear, reproducible examples. It does not.
Base Information: A Rubik's Cube, Not a Ladder of Progress
Imagine a Rubik's cube. Its faces can be rotated, the combinations change, but the cube remains a cube. It does not turn into a cylinder or a cone. In the same way, a kind is stable: within it, variations, adaptations, changes in color, size, and behavior are possible — but going beyond the boundaries of the kind is impossible.
This base information was loaded by the Creator from the beginning into the first individuals of each kind. When the process of reproduction began, this information started to manifest in the descendants in different combinations. What we call «evolution» is in fact the unfolding of already existing information, not the creation of new information.
God, knowing that the external environment would change, provided each kind with the ability to adapt to its habitat — but within the limits of the program placed within it.
Man: All Diversity Was in Adam
Consider man. Humanity is divided into races, nationalities, and external types. But all the information within which the external appearance of man can change was placed in Adam from the beginning. Eve was taken out of Adam — she was already in him. All humanity, all races and nationalities already existed in Adam at the moment of his creation, as potential, as hidden combinations of the base program.
The ability of skin to change color depending on habitat, differences in body structure, adaptations to climate — all of this is not the result of random mutations fixed by selection but the manifestation of information placed there from the beginning.
Selective Breeding: Proof of Hidden Potential, Not of Evolution
The work of breeders is the best confirmation of this model. The enormous diversity of dog breeds — from the Chihuahua to the Great Dane — did not arise through the creation of new genetic information. It was extracted from the ancestor of the kind, into which God had placed all this potential.
Breeders do not create new genes. They select combinations that already existed in hidden form. The same happens with plants: varieties of cabbage, wheat, and apples are all variations within the base program, not transitions between kinds.
«The cube does not become a cylinder or a cone but always remains a cube. In the same way, the kind is stable, and transitional forms between kinds do not exist».
The Flood: Two Individuals Are Enough to Restore a Kind
When God decided to judge the world by the Flood, He commanded Noah to take two of every creature:
«And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female. Of fowls after their kind, and of cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the earth after his kind, two of every sort shall come unto thee, to keep them alive». Genesis 6:19–20 (KJV)
Why are two individuals enough? Because the base information about each kind is fully contained in every individual of that kind. Two individuals of different sexes can restore the whole diversity of the kind, because the program is already within them. It does not take thousands of individuals to «accumulate» mutations for a new kind. All that is needed is a pair of carriers of the original code.
Mutations: Copying Errors, Not an Engine of Progress
So-called mutations are errors in copying the base information. They do not improve the genetic code and do not multiply information. In the overwhelming majority of cases (more than 90%) they are harmful: they cause diseases, deformities, and loss of function. Even those mutations that are called «beneficial» are beneficial only relatively and from a human point of view — for example, a sixth finger is not always better than five, and resistance to an antibiotic is often achieved at the cost of losing the efficiency of other systems.
A mutation is corruption, not creation. It can alter an existing gene, break it, or duplicate it, but it does not create a new complex program from scratch.
The Cambrian Explosion: Data That Do Not Fit Evolution
The Cambrian explosion — about 541 million years ago — is often cited as an argument for evolution: «look, life exploded with diversity». But on closer inspection, the data say the opposite.
Within a geologically short time (6–10 million years), almost all major animal body plans appear. From the standpoint of gradual evolution, this is an anomaly, not a confirmation. The «Cambrian pananimalia genome» hypothesis, proposed by Susumu Ohno in 1996, suggests that the animals of that time already possessed an almost identical set of genes, and differences in body structure arose through differential use of that common set.
In other words, science itself is arriving at the conclusion: the information was already there, and the explosion was the unfolding of different combinations of one base program. This corresponds exactly to the biblical model: God created each kind with all the necessary information, and subsequent history is variation within boundaries, not the creation of something new.
Brief Conclusion
Science has no examples of genetic code improvement. Experiments show rearrangement, duplication, and loss of information — but not its creation. The Bible says that God created living creatures after their kinds, placing in the first individuals of each kind all the base information for diversity and adaptation.
Evolution as a mechanism for creating new information is a belief, not a proven fact. The data agree with creation: the kind is stable, the information is original, and variations are the unfolding of the potential placed within.
Sources and Directions for Further Study
- Genesis 1:21–25; 6:19–20 (KJV) — the biblical account of creation by kinds and the command to Noah.
- Susumu Ohno, «The notion of the Cambrian pananimalia genome», PNAS, 1996 — the «universal genome» hypothesis of Cambrian animals.
- The Long-Term Evolution Experiment (LTEE) with E. coli — data on «proto-genes» and the recruitment of existing sequences.
- Studies of de novo gene birth in primates — data on the removal of a block from existing sequences.
- Michael Denton, «Evolution: A Theory in Crisis» — a critique of neo-Darwinism from the standpoint of biochemistry.
- Simon Conway Morris — the concept of «front-loading» of genetic information.





